Powered By Blogger

Friday 17 July 2015

Ant-Man (not quite a review)


  So on the 15th I went to an advanced screening of Ant-Man. My expectations were low, not because of the turmoil during production, but because the last few Marvel films have left me cold, unimpressed and unfulfilled. However Ant-Man is the first Marvel film I've enjoyed since the first Avengers film.

* NO SPOILERS AHEAD *


 Ant-Man starts a little weak with a flash back, and when I say weak it's because of some awful CGI (Just don't stare at Michael Douglas' face!), but as the film continues into Present Day it gathers into a more steady pace of character and arch development, and maguffin establishment. Paul Rudd was surprisingly convincing and didn't try to carry all of the humour in the film, in fact Michael Pena's character Luis provides most of the big laughs. The villain of the piece, Darren Cross, is played by Corey Stoll, who is thankfully sporting his natural baldness (That wig he has to wear in The Strain is TERRIBLE) and Evangeline Lilly (Hope van Dyne) and Michael Douglas (Hank Pym) round off the main cast. 
 The film is littered with Marvel universe in jokes, my favourite of which was when Scott Lang (Rudd) first dons the Ant-Man suit and gets sucked up by a Kirby vacuum cleaner.


  All in all, it's a great film and does well to not get mired in establishing future Marvel films, which has proven to be the ruin of EVERY Marvel sequel to date, and can be viewed as a standalone without having to watch Phase One and Two first.



 And being a Marvel film, the credits and post credits are littered with mouse watering (episodic) snippets, so remember to watch until the end of the credits.

Optimum viewing order:
Thor
Ant-Man

Upcoming:
Captain America: Civil War
Doctor Strange
Guardians of the Galaxy 2
(As yet untitled) Spider-Man (Reboot number 2)
Thor: Ragnarok
Avengers: Infinity Wars Part One
Black Panther
Captain Marvel
Avengers: Infinity War Part Two
Inhumans

Guilty Pleasures:
Howard the Duck
Blade
The Invincible Iron Man
Ultimate Avengers
Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes - Season One
Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes - Season Two

Wednesday 15 July 2015

Vimeo Find of the Month - July (Please Open Documentary)


  I haven't done one of these in a while, as I've been rather busy working on projects, the website and the like, but it's time yet again for another... Vimeo Find of the Month!

View it here:

  This short documentary is actually about a movie cinema I spent many a Friday and Saturday night at in the late 80's and early 90's. On many occasion I was sadly the only person in the entire cinema.
  I was a bit of a loner around that time so I went to anything that was playing, no matter how bad! It was my way of supporting the owners at the time and a chance to get out of the house (before my rebellious latter teen years ensued).
  Some of the films I remember seeing there were Overboard, Housesitter, Wayne's World and Shadowlands.

Auckland's Crystal Palace
 I've always had a passion for the grandeur of classic cinema and theater design (many now of the past as more and more are demolished or left to age disgracefully), the mystique and majesty of the adornments were so intricate and engrossing you could stare in wonder for hours.... Then the lights went out and the movie began.

Auckland's St. James
Auckland's Civic
 If you can find it, Wayne Brittenden's now out of print The Celluloid Circus is a wonderful account of many of the now long gone cinemas and "picture houses".





Tuesday 7 July 2015

Instamic on IndieGoGo


  So I've jumped on the bandwagon of another IndieGoGo funding venture. I saw the Instamic pop up quite a bit on my Facebook feed so I started watching it closely. It was an interesting idea and a great/cheaper/smaller/more versatile option for the Tascam or Zoom.


  Sadly I watched a little too long and missed the first wave of perks, so as soon as the second tier perks were up I funded.

 Pop over to the IndieGoGo Instamic page for MUCH more information

Some of the rather handsome specs & abundant information from the page:









Wednesday 1 July 2015

Social Media - What should you be doing? (a disgruntled blocker)



  In an age of social media engagement it's very easy to hype yourself out of contention in vying for attention. What does this mean? Well with the heavier restrictions on engagement on Facebook (which are all aimed at profiting as they require monetary payment for your post to engage the public) it's harder and harder to reach the people who are interested.

  Just because you have X number of likes or followers, doesn't mean everybody is going to see your post/update, but this doesn't mean you have to re-post the same information repeatedly throughout the day, nor does it mean you have to constantly post.

  How do you convert posts and updates to views on Facebook? Well, to be honest I don't push either of my pages/groups but let me give you a rundown:











Page - Scapegoat Productions
Likes: 49
Last Post: 13 June 2015
People Reached: 21
Likes: 1
Comments: 0
Active promotion: 0
Availability: Open to All 











Group - Box Dog
Likes/Members: 80
Last Post: 29 June 2015
People Reached: 12
Likes: 5
Comments: 1
Active promotion: 0
Availability: Closed Group

Let's start with the page, the reached conversion rate is almost half and although there is a lack of interactivity, I have never actively promoted the page to gain more likes. People following that page are either past clients of friends of mine, if I want more coverage, I need to plead with those already subscribed to invite their friends which is paramount to panhandling and is probably going to drive people away. What I appear to be doing correctly however, is limiting the number of posts and updates which appears to convert to views. In fact until the demise of RSS Graffiti the majority of my posts on that group were RSS feeds from this blog. Constant engagement can be detrimental and result in your posts being blocked on timelines (the mentality is - I still want to follow the page, but I don't want the constant updates - I've even done this myself).

 Next, the group. Again this group is not regularly posted to, and although the last post was a poor conversion most previous posts reach a quarter or a third of the members, however I did falter on this one. I wasn't on the ball with the changes to notifications and probably should have promoted people to set the notifications to All Posts, the group doesn't spam, so it would have been a reasonable request but realistically it's a closed group and membership requests are filtered.


 What does this all mean??? Well people don't want to be bugged, the frequency of your posting will result in less people reached as more and more change the notification settings. You've probably done it to a friend, you feel guilty about potentially unfriending that person so instead you block their feed.

Reasons to block notifications:

1.      Constant updates
2.      Constant self-absorbed updates (individuals)
3.      Constant updates about negative things in your life (Individuals)
4.      Repeating updates
5.      Sharing Memes, pictures and videos (that don't relate to you, your company or your page/group) CONSTANTLY
6.      Regularly posting events or dates for events in another Country (if you have International followers)

 At least one of the above items would have caused you to block someone or something at least once.

 I work with bands every so often, whether it be for live videos or music videos and often they have no plan for social media, or they simply intend to post a link daily/hourly to something, whether it's a gig or a video or what have you. What I tell them, although specific to being a band, applies to everyone trying to self-promote.

How to post on social media:

1.      Resist the urge to post (Think - Is it post worthy?)
2.      Post once a week, twice a week very infrequently. You may have exciting things to share, but  
         share the relevant stuff - Gig this week (Get people through the door), video of your last show, 
         not so important (but if you have an event page on Facebook, put the video on THAT page!).
3.      Never upload your videos to Facebook, always upload them to You Tube or Vimeo and link to 
         them (this will give you better coverage and better analytics for views, from there you can find 
         out so much more about who you are actually reaching!)
4.      Keep it cheerful and keep it concise (say what you have to say in no more than 2 sentences,  
         leave out the bad news unless it's something catastrophic)
5.      Once your external link has created the preview, REMOVE the link! It looks messy! And yes 
         your information will still be posted provided the preview is still visible.
6.      If you are in a band or an employee of a company, get more views by sharing the post from the 
         band/company page. Individuals can share the latest update without making the source      
         page/group the bad guy (for over posting) - This too can generate additional members or likes 
         from those not already subscribed.

  Most of these solutions are pretty stupid proof, so it's more a matter of self-control or thinking strategically about your next comment or post. You might not always get the engagement you're looking for, but you will get the views, which means you are staying relevant in the eyes of subscribers. I know many many other people have posted similar articles or opinions on the mystical world of social media, but realistically, this is from the point of view of a regular blocker, I'm relaying the information that makes me either want to continue subscribing, block or unsubscribe, so it's all pretty obvious stuff really...

  Now, what if you don't already have social media covered and you're looking to start? Clearly the first place to start is with a presence on Facebook and if you're going to have video content, it would be wise to start a YouTube Channel or Vimeo Channel.

Do I want a group or a page on Facebook? 

Group:
  If you're looking for a fully interactive social media site, a group is a good place to start, this will allow members to discuss and or ask questions. You can assign administrators, but there is a further requirement for policing, especially since bots tend to randomly post every so often in open groups.
Page:
  If you're a band or a company not looking for full interactivity, a page is a better option. You only need people to like you and you're away, updates will be specifically about you or your "product", but you need people to amend that coveted Notification option! 

 In most cases, a page will suffice, if you're a film maker and looking to gain traction on an upcoming project, it might be worth trying a group to spark ideas and add to the creative process, but this is seldom done, you would be a pioneer!

 Lastly, don't spread yourself too thin, you don't need Tumblr, Blogger, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram etc.. Unless of course you have multiple people to look after these entities. You're not going to convert all your followers into across the board followers. They probably won't follow you on each social media platform, so start with the basics, Facebook and You Tube (again if you're going to have video), or Sound Cloud (that one should be obvious). The more platforms you're looking after, the more frequently you'll be burning time updating and interacting, and less time doing what you are meant to be doing (in said business or band). Just start a couple and go from there, you'll find Facebook may be all you require initially/eventually.


... Now, get NOT posting, and plan that next update carefully.

Wednesday 20 May 2015

Pocket Cameras, Action Cameras, Smart Phones - The filming revolution is coming (it's already here!)


 I've been an advocate for pocket HD cameras for a while, ever since I got a Samsung U10. The U10 is probably the worst introduction to Pocket Cameras, as was the second one I got, a Kodak Zi10. BUT once I got my first Kodak Zx5, I was hooked, and impressed.

 Since those early days of trail and error by purchase, I have amassed an embarrassing number of smaller cameras. I currently have (with abridged Pros and Cons):

Samsung U10:
Pros:
Compact & surprisingly comfortable to hold

Cons:
Almost everything else (especially sound quality)


Kodak Zi10:
Pros:
External Mic input
Shoots wide when held upright = Comfortable single handed control
Tripod mountable

Cons:
TFT responsiveness is rubbish! You spend most of your time trying to get the options to respond.


Kodak Zi8:
Pros:
External Mic input
Tripod mountable

Cons:
Battery life when shooting 1080
Bulky/odd shape/size


2x Kodak Zx5:
Pros:
Waterproof to 3m
Tripod mountable

Cons:
Mic needs to dry out before next use (unless you cover the Mic and speak with a little Gaff)
Output format is compressed and m4v (not native for Final Cut Pro) so requires conversion for editing


Go Pro Hero (960):
Pros:
Compact
Heaps of accessories (including aftermarket) 

Cons:
No screen
Heavily dated
Not full HD
Awkward to hold so really needs to be mounted
Sound is terrible
Lens can't adapt and adjust quickly to changeable light conditions
Says supports 32gb SD, but often drops frames unless using a 16gb card


Go Pro Hero 2:
Pros:
Full HD 1080
Heaps of accessories (including aftermarket)

Cons:
No screen
Awkward to hold so really needs to be mounted
Sound is often terrible quality
Lens can't adapt and adjust quickly to changeable light conditions


Go Pro Hero 3+ Black:
Pros:
Wifi (including smart phone app operation)
More compact and a little less awkward to hold
Heaps of accessories (including aftermarket)
Replaceable battery
Wifi remote included

Cons:
Haven't used it enough yet (give it time)


4x SJ4000 (and Clones):
Pros:
Screen
Heaps of accessories (mostly aftermarket)
Replaceable battery
Good menu system for settings
Great adaptability to light changes

Cons:
Too many clones you often don't know whether Original, SJ, or Clone, or Clone of Clone (but most work fine, just no Firmware updates)
Battery is often ridiculously hard to get out if in a hurry (but I've potentially found a solution for this)


 So why am I dreading up all of this? Well just the other week Pixars John Lasseter said the likes of iPhones and GoPro's will change the face of filmmaking, and soon.

 Although, Chan-Wook Park filmed his short film Night Fishing on an iPhone 4 in 2011, it's obvious the revolution has long since started

Chan-Wook Park - Night Fishing

 Read the article on The Verge:

 We already know the filming revolution is here as more and more quality short films are produced using cheaper spectrum cameras and gear, but all this proves is that a good script, great actors and a little post magic in editing can make any footage appealing. John Lasseter has merely caught up and is now vindicating and advocating this movement towards what was once the lower end or taboo cameras. 
  Go Pro have their own channel dedicated to short films shot with their devices, and it's well worth wading through.

GoPro Short Film Channel


Links:
Kodak - Camera Comparison
Seemingly OLD buyers guide

Friday 24 April 2015

Warm and Cool - A Week of Technique and Stylisation


    An often overlooked technique are the "warm" or "cool" looks. These techniques can be achieved using editing techniques and grading now, however they were once an in camera effect.

  Stylistically, these tones were/or have been achieved with film stock and lighting. The "Warm" look was achieved using daylight lighting with Tungsten film stock (think early Guy Ritchie films like Lock, Stock or Snatch). 

Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Trailer:

Snatch - Trailer:


  The "Cool" look was the reverse, using Tungsten lighting with Daylight film stock (think Brian Helgeland's Payback). 

Payback - Trailer:

  Granted the use of filters can and does go a long way to also achieve these looks, but for the ease of lay explanation, that is basically it.

For more in-depth information check this out:

Here's a video comparison:
                                                               - Pixels & Frequencies

  Meanwhile, over at Sploid, here is the original post, with the video from above:

Links:

Thursday 23 April 2015

Editing... abridged - A Week of Technique and Stylisation


 And back over at No Film School this video was posted a few weeks back and is a quick explanation and look into the history of film editing by the guys at Film School'd.

Watch the video here:

The full article on No Film School:

  Although the above video is more dedicated to the art of perception, especially with the use of montage, there is some good information here. My main concern is the lack of clarity on continuity, which for me personally, can make or break a film. Bad continuity has the ability to remove the suspension of disbelief and completely lose the viewer interest in the process. 

Film Riot explain continuity here:

  My, personal, favourite film for excessive continuity errors has to be Jurassic Park and there is no end of videos pointing these errors out on You Tube, but here are a couple to help you better understand how a film, no matter how good you think, can be heavily marred by bad continuity.

Jurassic Park Mistakes Part One:

And for good measure, Part Two:

Links:


Wednesday 22 April 2015

The Fincher way - A Week of Technique and Stylisation


  Even a bad David Fincher film is an education, and more often than not, it's always a good idea to watch and re-watch the works of certain directors. David Fincher is one of those directors, from his early work directing music videos to having Alien 3 dumped in his lap, he was quickly able to write his own ticket...

Tony Zhou video essay: 
David Fincher - And the other way is wrong

Filmography:

 2014 Gone Girl 
 2013 House of Cards (TV Series)
 2011 The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
 2010 The Social Network
 2008 The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
 2007 Zodiac
 2002 Panic Room
 1999 Fight Club
 1997 The Game
 1995 Se7en
 1992 Alien³


Links:
David Fincher - IMDB
Tony Zhou
Bhushan Mahadani - Article

Tuesday 21 April 2015

Noir Noir Noir - A Week of Technique and Stylisation



   Tom Antos has been at it again, a while back, he released a short tutorial video on no budget lighting for Noir filming for the No Film School website.

Check out the video here:
 Read the No Film School page here:

  But what is film Noir?, well originally it was a Black and White filming style used heavily in American crime dramas, and as more and more of these films were released they all became a watered down parody of themselves; to the point of being "hand coloured" with heavy blacks and not much else (EG: Bugsy Malone). But the Black and White stylistic Noir went out of fashion, though the film content remains to this day (EG: Gangster Squad, although a better example would be Sam Mendes' Road to Perdition). A perfect book, which is essentially Noir, would be Charles Bukowski's Pulp, which is screaming for a film adaptation.
  Although the Noir look can be done very poorly/badly, it's now a little used effect which, when done well, can really make your low budget pop... provided the material is suitable of course. 
  Films like the adaptations of Sin City and it's Sequel, have made good use of the Noir look, although in a heavy green screen environment which is classed as Neo-Noir, it's just a pity they never quite lived up to expectations or the Frank Miller source material.

Links:

Sunday 12 April 2015

Lists! Always with the lists!


 Often we stumble, haphazardly, across a byline on some social media sites which seem interesting, but more often than not, they are lists. Most of the time these lists are not even click worthy, other times they aren't as informative as they suggest, but once in a while there are some little gems/nuggets.

  In the last week The Beat (Premium Beat), who often post "lists", have posted a few, one which is a little misleading and mis-informative, and another which is quite informative and good.

 Let's start with the misleading list.


  Now, you've either clicked the link and you're no longer reading, or you're patiently awaiting my explanation as to why this list is... Well, a bit rubbish.
  •   The prices are in American dollars, this should be referenced in the heading, it's not hard to add (USD or US) to the title. It's clearly going to be viewed by International audiences since they (these links) often appear on social media, which has no global borders.
  •   Most of the cameras are BARELY under $1000 (US), so you aren't necessarily getting the deal of the century.
  •   Several of the cameras listed are the body only (the exception is the GoPro), so although you'll be paying under $1000 (US), you can't go out shooting immediately. You'll now need to find competitively priced lenses and or research the best/better lenses (bang for buck). In other words, you need to spend additional research time AND you're still going to need to spend more money before you have a functional camera.
  •   The post is potentially sponsored as all prices are linked back to the B&H site. They are generally cheaper in some cases and will ship Internationally, but the referential tags in the links suggest The Beat get a modest referral fee, this isn't a bad thing, but it maybe to push up sales or push non or slow moving stock (but this is conjecture only).
  Don't get me wrong, there are some positive aspects to this list, they do include pros and cons for each of the 8 cameras and they also feature a couple of filmed examples. But of all the cameras listed, only two are ACTUALLY filming specific cameras, the others have it as a secondary feature to their primary function (of taking PHOTOGRAPHS!), this makes the prices reflective of the functionality. Granted most of the cameras have been adopted by countless filmmakers, but I'd rather see HD video specific cameras listed, at least the majority of those you can immediately hit the streets and shoot with.

  The next post is a little closer to getting you where you need to be, if you already have a camera (obviously) and you're looking to start filming something (watchable), the following might be a little more your speed:

  •   Number 4 in this list is a decent LED light, you should never rely on natural lighting as it's so changeable. A minimum of 3 lights will see you at least able to shoot interviews or MCU and CU shots for a short, just remember to defuse your lights if they're too bright or harsh. And also remember to have three lights offering the same light type (EG: Tungsten or Daylight). White balancing also helps!
  •   Depending on your camera, item 6 on the list is also a worthy purchase. If you're filming guerrilla style and need to be in and out of an area (due to a lack of permission, restricted access, or private domain) a monopod is quickly and easily setup and doesn't need to be collapsed to be moved once setup. Just remember, a monopod is still a poor substitute for a Tripod.
  •   The 7th item on the list is a good pair of headphones, but the main point here is to ensure you have over head headphones and preferably noise cancelling, this will ensure you can more easily hear your shot clearly and can pick up on that plane/car/screaming child/siren/etc, which will potentially ruin your sound or continuity in post production.
  •   Clean sound is good sound, never rely on your DSLR cameras internal mic, they aren't great in most situations, 8 on the list is a nice basic Rode video mic and at a reasonable price. BUT before purchasing a microphone, always do some research and read the pros and the cons or reviews for each product. So much post production time can be lost trying to remove pops and burrs or just dirty feed from microphones and/or your filming environment. A good microphone with direction adjust-ability (for Shotgun, Omni/Directional positioning) is always of better benefit.
  •   If you have the luxury of a sound person, the Tascam DR-05, positioned at number 9 on the list, is a good start. But for my money I would spent a LITTLE bit more and get the DR-40, it has much more functionality and versatility. Although Tascam would be my preferred brand, don't look past the Zoom recorders, a lot of people swear by them and they too are competitively priced.

  •   Lastly on the list, a bag, this one is obvious especially if you are a crew of one, or just looking to shoot B-Roll. Never underestimate the need for bags and cases, and try and separate your production "departments" as best as possible (EG: A case for sound, a hard case for cameras, a briefcase style case for cables and so on). If it can all fit in your boot, you're ready to go out and shoot.
 Granted there are some very specific items on this list which aren't entirely necessary, the over the shoulder rig is nice, but you can achieve more with a Manfrotto Fig Rig as they are just a bit more versatile and less restrictive. 

  Other items listed are clearly brand specific, so if you don't own a canon camera, or a canon camera which is compatible, then these items are realistically wasting space here, space which could be used a little more expansively. Perhaps a boom pole, or directional lighting could have been included and replace the Canon specific items... Just a thought.

  There is a third (much older) list, which is a little comical, but it does list items often over looked.



  •   Items 2 (Sandbags), 3 (Clamps), 5 (Gaffer tape), and 12 (Notebook) should never be underestimated and ideally included in every field kit. Granted 5 (Gaffer tape) and 12 (Notebook) should ALWAYS be present, no exceptions!
   
  


  •   The cable bag listed at number 7 is a good idea, but as previously mentioned, and the more cables you have, the more likely you should look to the better functionality of aluminum "briefcase" type cases. Many of these cases already have elastic looping/strapping in the lids which removes the need for individual cable ties and will go a long way to speed up your setup time.

 Happy Filming!

Saturday 11 April 2015

Simplified demystification... Blu-ray Vs. DVD


 I've previously mentioned the benefits of Blu-ray, and also the flaws where up-scaling is concerned (See previous blog post: *I guess I'll have to buy the White Album again... Part One), but I failed to simplify the differences between the two disc type mediums. Most people will understand these differences as mentioned in the below blog post (from Mighty Ape), but sometimes it's hard to explain to laypersons or parents, the lack of overt detail may just make the difference a little easier for you to explain.

 The chimps over at Might Ape have done just that in a nice, compact, compressed, concise, and demystifying way (yes, some of those weren't required, but you may have seen what I did there).

 Read their blog post here: DVD vs Blu-ray - which is better?

 Personally, I don't think I could have simplified it any better, however there are a few pros and cons they omit, but again I went WAY too in-depth in my aforementioned post.

Links:
Mighty Ape
Mighty Ape Blog
Wikipedia - Blu-ray
Wikipedia - DVD (Digital Video Disc)