Powered By Blogger

Sunday, 18 May 2014

Ode to the efforts of NZ on Screen

 NZ On Screen often have some great videos which are a great portal into the past. Whether it be documentaries, short films, trailers or television shows/segments there is some really interesting stuff to watch and or recall. NZ on Screen really have to be commended for salvaging some cringe-worthy, some downright bizarre and some generally great programming.

 Sometimes it's great just to sit and watch the background of some of the short films and documentaries and remember just how much Auckland City and New Zealand has changed in such a short amount of time. Sadly many of these changes were to the detriment of some beautiful architecture.

Here is a small selection of my personal picks:

Queen Street - Short Film - 1980

 Queen Street is a fantastic look at the bridge into adulthood and more so at how I remember Auckland City when growing up. Some might also recognise Kelly Johnson (as Scott) who that following year (1981) went on to star as Gerry in the classic Goodbye Pork Pie, which I would also recommend.


A Haunting We Will Go - Television Series - 1979-80


 As a child, this show scared the heck out of me, although watching it today it's a far cry from anything I could ever consider frightening, other than perhaps the over acting? 

Is It I Count Homogenized - Television Series - 1982


 Actor Russell Smith (Play School & Shark in the Park), who played Count Homogenized in A Haunting we will go went on to reprise his role as the milk slurping/stealing vampire and get his very own show in 1982's Is it I Count Homogenized.


Terry and the Gunrunners - Television series - 1985

 Continuing with the "Kidult" entertainment, the screen adaptation of Terry and the Gunrunners (book/graphic novel by Stephen Ballantyne and Bob Kerr) was mind-blowing for those watching in 1985. The segues from larger than life live action to animated comic book frame to computer game styled action sequences was pretty advanced for NZ television and met with fantastic praise. The highlight was always Billy T as a biker and not to forget the whole 'kids can do' attitude the show exuded.


Ice TV - Television Series - 1995-2000

 Ice TV was a satirical, yet loose, magazine style show for "young adults", which was in turn a watered down version of several other shows prior. At times Ice TV was very hit and miss, some shows were just terrible and seemed like they were trying to push a turd, others were seamless and television brilliance. Host Nathan Rarere has since gone on to work heavily in sports radio and television, and had previously been involved with another show called Box Dog a skit based show on music Television station Max TV. Petra Bagust has since gone on to host several shows including Morning News/magazine shows, and Jon Bridges is one of the Producers behind the hugely popular 7 Days.


Life on Ben - Series - 2002

  In 1999 I received a phone call out of the blue from the wife of an old friend, they offered me an internship working on a show they had in development at the time, that show was Life on Ben. Sadly I was unable to accept the offer as I was about to become a father and couldn't afford to be an unpaid intern, but I often think back and wonder what if... Life on Ben was a fantastic concept for Edu-tainment, but due to the development and stop motion animation time it was beaten to the punch by the film, and subsequent series, Osmosis Jones which was similar, and Life on Ben didn't quite pick up as it should have. It does however feature the voice talents of Flight of the Conchords star Jermaine Clement and BOY director Taika Waititi. Creator Luke Nola went on to create Let's Get Inventin', which is fantastic and involving children's programming. 


Ready to Roll (AKA: RTR) - Television Show - 1975-94
Radio With Pictures - Television Show - 1976-88

 Both were music shows offering music videos and live performances of local and foreign acts. Although RTR was the more commercial of the two shows being a top 20 countdown, it was Radio with Pictures which opened up a world of different music and broadened musical horizons with more "alternative" flavours. But at one time both shows were the 'go to' for recommendations on what next to buy on Vinyl and latterly cassette tape. Sadly, if there are any music television shows left, they are heavily sponsored and paid commercials (by the record companies) for tasteless mass produced rubbish and product placement.


Lastly:
New Zealand Grand Prix - Documentary - 1961

 This is a brilliant time capsule which proves New Zealand was once a thriving motor racing destination, sadly this is not the case any more with events few and far between, but none particularly "International". It's a great watch and wonderful so see local motor racing heroes who have long past.


 There are hundreds upon hundreds of gems waiting to be discovered and re-discovered thanks to the tireless efforts of the staff at NZ on Screen it's just so easy to go there and lose a few hours, it's also a great way to see how different early New Zealand broadcasting was, often with twinges of matter of fact Radio broadcaster approach by presenters, a format/habit long since forgotten.

PS: If you hadn't already realised, all images are links to footage or footage pages... As per usual.

Friday, 16 May 2014

Net Neutrality - For or Against?

  As per some of my previous posts:


  The latter entry may not be the case for much longer. The FCC have, for some time now, been trying to police the Internet (which was never meant to occur). When the Internet became freely available to Joe Public it was an opportunity to speak to people abroad cheaply, find and research information without leaving the house, and watch cat videos (like this one doing the rounds) while in your underwear. Heck the Internet, thanks to Google maps, can be the visual experience of walking around the racetrack at Monza or walking through Scott Base in Antarctica, things that everyday people might never get the opportunity to do. But with the potential for experiences there is also the potential for self promotion and a possible audience, and this is what I've made an extensive point of previously.

  I'm not going to make the same point, I'm merely going to point out that groups of music artists (Future of Music Coalition & Free Press) have come out in support of what I have been saying and have signed a letter in support of Net Neutrality addressed to Tom Wheeler; who is clearly out of touch with the true nature of what the Internet is and is seemingly pushing the agenda of big businesses. The letter is eloquently written and expresses much of what I've been saying (or trying to say).

Read the article and letter on Pitchfolk.com

 Click to read Evan Minsker's article and the Letter - Artist Unknown

 Several Countries have fallen to Internet policing or restrictions, New Zealand is one of the many, and has been for sometime now (thanks to the Warner Brothers Studio deal with the National Government when securing The Hobbit films), but Australia have taken it to a further extreme with new Internet Censorship Laws, which are explained to Ma and Pa as protection for the children, but are clearly an invasion of privacy. Some may say if you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear, but what if you are wrongly accused, taken out of context, or just have a warped sense of humour and your comments are taken literally? There are also so many small ways you can infringe on Copyright laws inadvertently, or have your works claimed as plagiarism by someone. What if you create a documentary or short film about a taboo subject or is in some way Anti-Government (real or fictional), what if you write the next Brave New World or 1984? Will censorship prevail and see your work removed? It's a slippery slope really. 
  We all know that the laws we face in day to day life do not work on the Net and are impossible to police on the Internet (so very many aren't even applicable), but wouldn't an Elected Global Governing Body be a better start, and on that commission ACTUAL Internet savvy people would also be beneficial... Instead of lay-people fearing SkyNet (from the Terminator films) as a very real thing and true possibility?


 What do you think? Do you support Net Neutrality?



Thursday, 15 May 2014

Nahnah nahnah nahnah nahnah.... Just Nah! (No)

 On the heels of a disappointing Superman film, with Man of Steel, followed by the disappointing announcement of Ben Affleck cast to play Batman/Bruce Wayne in the upcoming Batman Vs. Superman movie, Zack Snyder posted this picture of a paunch Batman and the new Batmobile.


 Sadly, I have very low expectations for this film, where Snyder has previously impressed, he just seems to have read into his own hype and keeps making larger and larger unapproachable films. While watching Man of Steel I couldn't help wondering why not combine all the flashbacks into one segment for pacing alone, there was no need to keep dropping in and out of present day at such a jarring rate of knots. By the end of the film I just didn't care and was more worried about the obvious collateral damage caused by the overtly long and over CG'ed final battle scenes. I'm not a Superman fan and I can't identify with the character as it is, so don't get me wrong, I was probably going to be nigh impossible to impress, but there are no endearing aspects to the film in my eyes. 
 Before I'm classed as a Snyder hater, I must say I really enjoyed his remake of George A. Romeros Dawn of the Dead, his adaptation of Frank Millers 300 (bar David Wenham's appalling Narration) and I (among the few) also enjoyed his adaptation of Alan Moores Watchmen. Even Sucker Punch had some good redeeming scenes for an otherwise flash over substance film.

  The saddest part of all is that the picture above with the tiniest amount of editing in PAINT! can further lose any redeeming qualities thusly:


  DC are on the back foot, this is obvious and have been for some time, Christopher Nolan's foray into the Batman universe started well but ended poorly, and you can see that Marvel have taken over the Superhero film universe with their regular (closely OR loosely) tied films (even if some of them were TERRIBLE or too interested in the end game) which lead to something larger at the end of each "phase", Phase one ending in The Avengers. But you can see by the cast announcements and their characters that the Batman Vs. Superman film is going to be a poorly devised fast track to a Justice League film and will lack the character development Marvel so richly achieved knowing they had an end game in mind. DC are winning in the Television stakes, but are facing a huge floundering at the box office. Who would have thought "Comic book" movies would mean anything in the grand scheme of things?

* Zack Snyder's picture sourced from Comingsoon.net


Monday, 12 May 2014

Johnny Express By Alfred Imageworks

I watched a great animated short film today which is currently a Staff Pick on Vimeo.

It's called Johnny Express by Korean animation studio Alfred Imageworks.
The blurb reads:

It's 2150
There are all sorts of Aliens living throughout space.
Johnny is a Space Delivery Man who travels to different planets to deliver packages.
Johnny is lazy and his only desire is to sleep in his autopilot spaceship.
when the spaceship arrives at the destination, all he has to do is simply deliver the box.
However, it never goes as planned. Johnny encounters strange and bizarre planets
and always seems to cause trouble on his delivery route.

Will he be able to finish his mission without trouble?


Even if you don't like animated films or animation, it's a great comical story with some rather dark humour and only runs a mere 5:27, but is in no way a waste of time and worth watching in it's entirety.

Check it out!

Click the image to view the film

Friday, 2 May 2014

What does a Fox say? Cancel another Sci-Fi show after it's first season! Of course!

 It would seem Fox have done it again. The premature demise of yet another Sci-Fi show before it's time. Not unlike Firefly, Almost Human has been canned, just as it was building and starting to pick up steam, and will not see a second season. Although Almost Human wasn't instantly gripping, it slowly but awkwardly found it's pace and began to impress with it's back and forth dialogue between the leads (Karl Urban and Michael Ealy) and often subtle special effects. Even the VERY poorly cast Captain (Lili Taylor) was starting to, VERY slowly, appeal.
 I find this highly irregular and just can't fathom why they keep making the same mistakes over and over again. Perhaps they need to look inward as it appears from the outside that it's mismanagement which causes this to keep happening... I have novel ideas, why not actually schedule episodes in order and stop repeating episodes mid season for a start... Although I don't know if those will catch on...




From TVRage.com:

'Firefly.' 'Alcatraz.' 'Terra Nova.' 'Dollhouse.' 'Dark Angel.' These are but a few of the FOX sci-fi and fantasy series to be canceled before their time. Over its more than a quarter-century of existence, the network has steadily built up a reputation as the place that genre shows go to die. Sadly, according to Deadline, one more name has now been added to that list.
Created by former 'Fringe' show runner J.H. Wyman, 'Almost Human' starred Karl Urban as Detective John Kennex, who blames an android (known as "synthetics" in this universe) for the death of his partner and the loss of his leg. Recently out of a coma, Kennex is eager to get back on the force, but finds himself forced into a reluctant partnership with Dorian (Michael Ealy), a synthetic who possesses a free spirit and wit unlike his cybernetic brethren. Together, they fight crime. No seriously, they do.
Thankfully, unlike some of the other sudden cancellations in FOX's history, 'Almost Human' didn't end its 13-episode season on any major cliffhanger. Still, there were several smaller plot threads left open, that fans will no doubt continue to speculate about long after 'Almost Human' fades into TV obscurity.
Some may wonder why 'Almost Human' (which averaged a 1.9 in the 18-49 demo and 6.2 million total viewers over the course of its first and now only season) is being canceled, while it's 2014 lead-out 'The Following' (which averaged a 1.8 demo and 5.2 million total viewers) was renewed early on.
We'll likely never know what FOX's thought process was, but some of it can no doubt be attributed to 'The Following's larger than usual DVR audience, which regularly almost doubled the serial killer thriller's live viewership.
Either way, what's done is done. Kennex and Dorian are gone, and they aren't coming back. Let the angry emails and tweets to FOX begin...now!

 This too is also interesting read, the proposal that Netflix should look to reboot or continue other prematurely cancelled shows

R.I.P.




Saturday, 19 April 2014

Independent Content Accessibility - It's always been here

 In a previous post I mentioned the ability to upload your content and try and make some money to fund your upcoming projects. I was merely pointing out the plausible applications of what the internet and some sites can do to provide this as an outlet, and for the most part this is still true, but I failed to provide some actual examples of this capacity/viability.

 Several years ago now I found a small independent film, which was freely download-able via Bit Torrent; remember Bit Torrents aren't always evil attempts at gaining content without paying, some people actually use this file sharing to share their very own content.
  2009's The Lionshare was my first encounter of this. What was seeming a short (an hour and 9 minutes roughly) independent film about love, life and file sharing was aptly released, initially, via Bit Torrent sites and was subject to much critical acclaim. The director also created a DVD and sold it via a website for the film, sadly I didn't manage to purchase a copy before the website went down and have since been unable to find a way to purchase it. Why would I purchase a film I've already downloaded? To support independent film makers and also because the DVD offered additional content, which I have always seen as an additional reason to own. A little insight into another film makers woes, trials and tribulations seems only apt and potentially helpful should you ever wish to release your own content. Seeing where someone else had problems or issues can usually raise enough awareness for your own potential project that you can research or foresee these issues for yourself before they arise. Even if the film you are watching was made in a different Country, there are still lessons to be learned.
  It's nice to see that the director Josh Bernhard has been working on various projects since and I would hope gained some notoriety at the same time.

Click to view the film


  Just the other week I stumbled upon the Otherworlds project on VODO, which to it's core is exactly what I'm referring to when I mention content, it's no longer just about a film, but about an offering of more. Granted these are packages of Sci-Fi cross platform (Movies, Music, eBooks, Images) offerings and don't actually tie into one another. 
  Although I have only recently discovered Otherworlds, it would appear this has been going for at least a year. You can take the free package on offer, or pay a little bit and get more, or pay a little bit more and get it all. Regardless I hope it flourishes and the material continues to improve and increase.



 There is plenty out there if you just search, but the easiest way to find the better short/feature length films and content on offer is to simply keep an eye on your favourite Torrent site, often these will have a splash on their home pages which lead to good quality independent releases which are free to download, and also check VODO at least weekly. I also recommend after you get it for free, you go and donate where possible.

  Torrent isn't always a taboo word, just make sure you're getting FREE content that is actually on offer for FREE!

Sunday, 16 March 2014

Google - Do you love or hate the arts? - Kurt Sutter has an interesting opinion...

  The pros and cons of submitting your content online have always been a moot point, and although there is the potential to earn money using You Tube, there are unrealistic viewer number expectations; and the monetization of pop-up ads and pre-video adverts don't result in money - and probably a higher likelihood of people jumping to another video on another channel rather than viewing your content.

  Considering some Countries still have dial up and others (like New Zealand) have heavily oppressive versions of ADSL, it is an realistic expectation that you will get no more than 5 minutes viewing of any video. By 5 minutes this also includes buffering in those Countries plagued by (globally considered) slow internet speeds. I stand by the ever present statements I make to clients and potential clients "don't aim to exceed 5 minutes" or "break your content down to multiple shorter videos to increase return viewership", of course the latter doesn't always result in returning viewers pending your output schedule and ability to retain interest in the content.... All this being said, I stumbled upon an open letter style article by the extremely talented Kurt Sutter. Although I firmly believe in his comments in the article, I can't help but feel that sometimes it's better the devil you know than the devil you don't.

  As a tremendously un-established talent (I use that 'T' word VERY lightly), I have no forum to show my work to a wider audience. I have a failed Vimeo account, as every time I have tried to upload a video (no matter the length) I get to around 90% before a failure and find I have to re-start my upload from scratch; and due to a lack of patience and persistence (AND capped internet data), I simply gave up and exhausted more energy on You Tube and to a lesser extent Facebook (which lacks analytics and thus renders you blind to the popularity of your content and what could be considered honest or positive constructive criticism - through retention and viewership). But we digress. I find the article (below, but I want you to finish reading before you leave) something of an omen of things to come, but also a call to arms for independent film makers to try alternatives, where possible, and forgo the risk if there is nothing at stake, the latter would be the best option for those independently financing their output with no need to re-coup. BUT for those people not looking to re-coup I would love to see more Big Cartel stores selling DVD's (and breaking with the green light and pan handling of financing sites) to a wider and International market (and there is a market if you can find it). I for one would love to see more content for inspiration of what can be accomplished with a little know how and some serious ingenuity, which SCREAMS *additional content on DVD's!!!!

  *Until very recently, Robert Rodriquez was the king of additional content offering film schools, behind the scenes, featurettes AND cooking schools... Sadly, especially since the Machette films, these are sorely lacking on the Blu-Ray and DVD releases making them nothing more than cheap poorly executed Z grade films with less and less in common with the budding film makers of today and an attempt at a quick buck (it would seem).

  Again I have digressed and expanded a little more than I intended (as the failings of Robert Rodriquez inspiration on inspiring budding film makers yearns for an entire blog entry in itself), my main point is that the internet is one avenue to ensure you gain an audience, but it is a fickle avenue and heavily flawed with little or no support or availability to funding for that next venture; although don't get me started on the requirement for local pirate television using disused VHF bandwidths devoid of attention and content (another entry I believe, although it completely lacks an ability for funding without internet enterprise). The article itself (on slate.com) points at Google and their ability to dismiss the unrealistic monetisation requirements for creative content. Again this doesn't have an immediate effect on budding film makers because we still need an arena, and Google makes up about 80% of that online arena, never the less, it is an eye opening and interesting read/rant/article:

I do not own this content in any way shape or form, I am merely pointing it out to potential readers


In addition, these articles are actually quite interesting:

Saturday, 4 January 2014

Duplicitous duplicity...

 Although I have nothing to do with the site or writer, this is an interesting read on some of the potentially duplicitous actions of some Hollywood studios. I can't say how factual it is and I suspect some of these mentioned occurrences are possibly accurate from one side, but perhaps not all are 100% gospel truth...



 The article is on the Film School Rejects website so have a read, it's an interesting article, if not a little one sided:

Sunday, 24 November 2013

The Long Wait for The Long Walk

  There is often talk of what should be made into a film, and in this case I'm referring to the adaptation of book as the source material (as I watch many films remade, re-launched and rehashed to a lukewarm response). I scream give me something new, that I know, BUT haven't seen!

  When I was a much younger man I read on the train every day as I made my way from school to work and then home. I read feverishly but I was highly reluctant to read any Stephen King, a long forgotten friend recommended one day that I try the works of his pseudonym Richard Bachman. I never had any intention of following this up or doing so, but one day I found myself in a second-hand book store and somehow gravitated to a copy of the Bachman books (for the ridiculous price of $5 NZ). I purchased it and started reading the 4 stories enclosed, and although two stories had a great effect on me, one had already been made into a film by that time, although poorly and unable to hold a candle to 
the source material, which was The Running Man, but it was the other story which held me captivated and forever contemplating a film adaptation, but obviously done well. And that other story was The Long Walk (written in 1979).


  The Long Walk, in a nutshell, is set in a Dystopian future that sees One Hundred teenage boys participate, by choice, force or need, in an annual walking contest called, originally enough, The Long Walk. The boys must maintain a constant and consistent walking speed of at least 4 miles an hour, if they drop or lag they get a series of warnings before they are ticketed, but as the story progresses being ticketed, they soon discover to be ticketed is to be immediately shot by the soldiers who monitor the walkers. Our protagonist is a 16 year old boy by the name of Raymond Garraty, and although there are multiple antagonists namely fatigue, the soldiers and their superior (and event organiser) The Major, it is the character of Gary Barkovitch who quickly establishes himself as an extremely unlikable fellow walker. Anymore information would render this a spoiler, so we can stop there.

  I really think this would make an engrossing film, and although I wish I had an iota of the talent, I really wish I did as I really don't know if I could write the emotion much less direct it in a young actor. However, my lack of talent aside, I have known for sometime that regular Stephen King adapter to film, Frank Darabont has had the rights to The Long Walk for quite awhile, and in some accounts, from trawling the internet, it is suggested he's had them since and possibly before his adaptation of the Novella Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption, better known to most as the film The Shawshank Redemption starring Tim Robbins, Morgan Freeman and the ever impressive Clancy Brown (leading and amidst an amazing cast).
  Knowing that Darabont has now done 3 theatrical King adaptations, which have all been rather stunning, I strongly believe The Long Walk to be in safe hands, but I want to see it come to light. Exhaustive Google searching has yielded very little information, but I did find a little nugget a while back which has had me thinking for sometime about the direction the film should take. The nugget was a line which read (and has since been added to the Wikipedia page for the book since).

-         He (Frank Darabont) said that he would "get to it one day". And that He plans to make it "low-budget, weird, existential, and very self contained".

 Not really a lot of information, but I said it was a nugget, a glimmer of hope, but as I said this has had me thinking for sometime about the direction of the film.

My Take:


  There is an often under used device, which can be jarring to the viewer, but that I think would suit this adaption perfectly, and that would be to shoot the majority of the Raymond Garraty footage in POV, in fact not even show the character until perhaps the second or even third act. But further to why I think it could actually work well follows; You can take or leave the works of "dynamic low budget duo" Mark Neveldine & Brian Taylor, now you're either asking who the hell are they or if I have completely lost my mind for even suggesting them, but it's a sound theory if they aren't left to write, direct and produce their own works. Their low budget camera craft and angles are very sound and although both of the Crank films weren't cinematic genius and don't get me started on their take on The Ghost rider franchise, with the "not as terrible as the first film, but pretty bad", Spirit of Vengeance. They are not destined for awards, but there are flashes of genius in the camera and camera use not seen since Robert Rodriquez' El Mariachi. A perfect case in point would be the "bigger" budget film Gamer, although again with an appalling script and a terrible third act, the 'in game' sequences work well and gave the film a glimmer of hope (before quickly tearing it away).

For some unknown reason I cannot embed the following video, but a better example than the Trailer above:

 The bleak nature of the source material matched with the camera style, and dark foreboding tone and feel of the Gamer in battle sequences cobbled with the digital low budget nature of the cameras and POV's (but MUCH tidier) used in the Crank films could actually result in a fantastic film when peered with the writing and directing brilliance of Frank Darabont, and could make for an eye-gasm of a film which would also generate a true emotive response for the audience, pending who is selected as editor obviously. And if you need a case in point for Darabont's directing, see what he got out of Thomas Jane (who is notoriously inexpressive in the majority of his roles) in the closing minutes of the often overlooked King adaptation The Mist. Even Stephen King himself said he wished he'd written Darabont's ending for The Mist (high praise).


  It's like a bucket list for the film if it ever sees the light of day, and although my opinion doesn't matter, it's the conceptualisation of what could be if all the planets were perfectly aligned etc... All I know is I've tried to write a similar short story for me to shoot, but every time it gets a little too close to plagiarism to the source material.

Monday, 23 September 2013

2007 John Woo Essay

 In 2007 my 14th assignment at film school was to write an essay, I'd never written one before as I had gone to a pretty liberal High School, the following is my attempt at an Essay, I have thrown in some hyperlinks, but for the most part it is unedited:

Introduction:

Director Wu Yusen is better known to audiences as John Woo and his influence on the action genre can be seen in many of today’s blockbuster films. His influential gunfight sequences amid romanticised morality tales of brotherhood, love, loyalty, adversity and anti-heroism started an entire sub-genre of action coined as either Gun-Fu or Heroic Bloodshed, and have echoed copy-cat imitations and western film-maker homages. His films from the 80’s revitalised the action genre; not just in Hong Kong but around the world. The movies A Better Tomorrow & A Better Tomorrow II, The Killer, Bullet in the Head and Hardboiled, were viewed as overpowering pop masterpieces of violent cinematic frenzy. So it seems quite surreal that John Woo almost became a Minister before eventually following his passion for film, and even more so when it is considered he was once touted as “The Hong Kong king of comedy”.

Humble Beginnings:

Born into poverty on September 26 1946 in Guangzhou China, John Woo and his family fled to Hong Kong in the late 1950’s to escape the communist revolution. As a child he was enrolled in a Methodist school where he felt socially isolated and had only a few friends. Surrounded by street violence and gangs he soon found solace in movies where he fell in love with the magic of musicals, westerns and animated films. With no film school in Hong Kong he called directors such as Jean-Pierre Melville, Henri-Georges Clouzot, Stanley Kubrick, Akira Kurosawa, Sam Peckinpah and Alfred Hitchcock some of his “teachers”, and when unable to afford a trip to the movies he would visit the library and absorb every and any book he could find about or relating to film.

Building his craft:

Due to the corruption and nepotism it was almost impossible to secure a job in the Hong Kong film industry, but in 1969 the industry leading Shaw Brothers Studio hired John Woo as apprentice under and assistant director to Chang Cheh, a leading martial arts director who, in Hong Kong, was often equaled to Japans Akira Kurosawa. In an industry and era where true opportunities weren’t abundant until a person reached their forties, John Woo was unwilling to pursue such a slow and grinding path to film making and, at 26 years old, left Shaw Brothers Studios and launched his own independent production company.
In 1973 John Woo made his directing debut with the martial arts action film The Young Dragons, but unfortunately his final cut of the film proved so savage and over the top that censors banned it for its excessive violence (It wasn’t until years later that a less naïve Woo discovered the censors were actually anticipating a bribe). Raymond Chow of Golden Harvest had somehow managed to acquire and view the banned film and saw a rough talent in John Woo. Chow purchased and released a heavily edited version of The Young Dragons and offered John Woo a three year directing contract. John Woo made several martial arts films for Golden Harvest, such as Last hurrah for chivalry (1978), which began to display some of the themes and techniques that would eventually become his trademark, but his films were all commercial disasters and soon he found himself looking for work.
Out of work and slightly disillusioned John Woo was eventually offered a contract at the newly formed Cinema City studio, but the contract was only under offer provided he turned his talents to directing comedies and soon he became known as “The Hong Kong King of Comedy”.
Through Cinema City John Woo meet kindred visionary Tsui Hark, who had used his position and status at the studio to form his own production company, FilmWorkshop. Tsui Hark wanted to push the envelope of Hong Kong pictures while incorporating high-end special effects and after reading John Woo’s draft script, loosely based on Kong Lung’s - Ying XiongBen Se, production began on the: A Better Tomorrow.


The Birth of Heroic Bloodshed/The Bullet Ballet:

"I've got more action than my man John Woo"
Beastie Boys (Lyrics from the track "Sure Shot" on Ill Communication)

A Better Tomorrow was a complete revelation; gunplay had never looked so exciting and visceral. It took the Peckinpah School of slow motion and sprayed blood to an entirely new and never before seen level. One of the most original and influential scenes, prior to the first major gunfight; Mark (Chow Yun-Fat) hides a series of back up pistols in a row of flowerpots on his way to terminate a group of Taiwanese gangsters. The scene influenced and was almost imitated in such films as Luc Besson’s Leon (AKA: The Professional), Antoine Fuqua’s The Replacement Killers and even in ShinichirôWatanabe animated feature Cowboy Bebop:Knockin’ on Heavens Door.

“It was brilliant! You could see a dozen American movies before you ever saw anything as clever as that!”
Quentin Tarantino (Hong Kong Action cinema, 1995)

A Better Tomorrow was an immediate success across all of Asia and started a fashion revolution which saw legions of young men sporting long black coats, Ray-Ban sunglasses and a toothpick clenched between their teeth, - A week after the film release the Ray-Ban sunglasses were sold out in all Hong Kong
John Woo (Asian Pop Cinema, 1999)

John Woo became the most sought after action director in the industry and was desperate to ride the wave and begin his next production, The Killer, but due to the overwhelming success of A Better Tomorrow the studio and Tsui Hark insisted Woo break his personal oath (to never make a sequel to one of his own films) and begin scripting for A Better Tomorrow II.

A Better Tomorrow II was well received by Asian audiences, the local reviews were mixed if not damning, but what no one had anticipated was the success and praise the film would receive in the United States while playing in a limited number of “art-house” theatres. The film and its predecessor gained cult status and eventually A Better Tomorrow II would go on to heavily influence Quentin Tarantino’s Reservoir Dogs, The Wachowski brothers The Matrix, Luc Besson’s Leon (AKA: The Professional) and John McTiernan’s Die Hard, many of which borrowed heavily from the last action/fight sequence.

The relationship between John Woo and Tsui Hark was quickly souring, but not before the two collaborated one last time on The Killer, which was a more action based remake of Jean-Pierre Melville’s Le Samouraï. The film confronted what Don Siegel’s Dirty Harry hinted at, the idea that the only difference between the hunter and the hunted is a badge. Danny Lee and Chow Yun-Fat play a cop and an assassin respectively, who become mirror images of one another and are eventually redeemed in the final shoot out fighting side by side. The Killer also saw the first ever on screen instance of John Woo’s best known signature, white doves taking flight after the first shot is fired and the final gun battle ensues. The doves I include to show, redemption of soul, purity before death.
John Woo (Interview on Hardboiled DVD, 1999)

Audiences were stunned when an effigy of the Virgin Mary was detonated during the climactic final gunfight and the film was almost cut for western release even though it received an R-rating globally. To me, (she) symbolises all that is good and pure. When the villains destroy the statue, it’s like they are destroying the last goodness.”
John Woo (Hong Kong Action Cinema, 1995)

The Killer became one of the most widely seen Cantonese-language films of all time, and although not a huge success in Asia the film was released in “art-house” theatres in the United States, and cemented Woo’s cult status.
“After enjoying art-house success in the US, The Killer was screened for the head of Universal Pictures when it was first suggested that Woo might make an American film. ‘Well, he can certainly direct an action scene’ observed the mogul afterwards. ‘Yeah, and Michelangelo can certainly paint a ceiling!’ fired back the Woo fan and advocate Quentin Tarantino. “
(Hong Kong Action Cinema, 1995)

The Killer had such an impact on the action genre that Renny Harlin’s Die Hard II, Ringo Lam’s Full Contact, Michael Mann’s Heat, Robert Rodriguez’s Desperado, Mikael Salomon’s Hard Rain, Corey Yuen’s The Transporter and Primo Giroldini’s Nel cuore della notte are just some of the many films and directors which claim to have made reference to or borrow from The Killer in one way or another.
This began a chain of events, which would eventually see John Woo becoming the first ever Chinese director to make a Hollywood film, but not for another four years.

Tsui Hark was so furious with the final cut of The Killer that the pair parted ways, Tsui Hark started production on A Better Tomorrow III which “borrowed” almost the entire concept for John Woo’s next, and most personal film Bullet in the Head, which was the final nail in the coffin for their friendship.
The events at Tiananmen Square, Woo’s own childhood and Michael Cimino’s TheDeer Hunter all played a big influence on Bullet in the Head and although considered by many as John Woo’s greatest film it was one of his least successful in Asia as audiences were becoming more sensitised to the ultra-violence in Hong Kong cinema. This was due to the increase in both Triad membership and involvement in the Hong Kong film industry as Triads started small film companies to both launder and make money, it was believed to be a direct result of what was considered John Woo’s glorification of gangsters in the first two A Better Tomorrow films and their subsequent “imitations”. It wasn’t until Jim Choi manager of Kung Fu star Jet Li was shot in an office building that a number of performers including Jackie Chan and Chow Yun-Fat took part in a public demonstration as part of Artists Against Violence campaign. John Woo came up with a creative solution to the problem with his next film, Hardboiled.

Hardboiled would be John Woo’s farewell to Hong Kong before leaving to live and work in the United States. Woo realised that he would face limitations when filming in the US and used Hardboiled as an opportunity to create a film which was two thirds action. Hardboiled is the story of a tough cop who discovers he has been pursuing an undercover cop amid a gun smuggling operation, but unfortunately the story-line went no further and relentless explosive action filled in the gaps, but the film worked. The extremely long climax of the film saw the destruction of an abandoned hospital after a chaotic and continuous three minute gun battle scene which to date had never been attempted by any other director, it worked brilliantly and confirmed Woo’s move to Hollywood. British stuntman Vic Armstrong made his feature length directorial debut with Joshua Tree which he, almost entirely, self funded in homage to and loosely based remake of Hardboiled.


And Beyond:

The United States has always been attracted to violent and fast paced action and the last decade has seen an increased and respect for films by John McTiernan, Quentin Tarantino, Robert Rodriguez, Sam Raimi and the Wachowski brothers, they have all mastered their directing but all claim the influence of John Woo.

“John Woo’s mastery of action is equal to Alfred Hitchcock’s mastery of suspense!”
Sam Raimi (Hardboiled UK DVD Release cover)

John Woo had expected and anticipated limitations in America but Universal Pictures still had doubts about the ability of a Chinese director handling an American crew and Sam Raimi was assigned to oversee Hard Target and take over if Woo didn’t work out. Sam Raimi accepted that making a mainstream studio film would impose limitations and restraint on John Woo’s work, but argued that John Woo at seventy percent is still going to blow away most American action directors working at one hundred percent!
Sam Raimi (Hong Kong Action Cinema, 1995)

After his shaky debut in America John Woo has since reached a plateau in Hollywood where he has the luxury and ability to hand select the films he directs and after the critical acclaim and box-office successes of his American films Hard Target, Broken Arrow, Face/Off, Mission Impossible II and Windtalkers, it is widely believed he has earned that right. His influence on gunplay and action can be seen and is hugely evident in many of Hollywood’s blockbuster action films from 1988 onward but his influence is not only limited to film. He has been the inspiration to many of today’s computer game creators, and popular game titles such as Max Payne, F.E.A.R., Unreal Tournament and Stranglehold


  John Woo has re-teamed with his muse Chow Yun-Fat and is currently working on The Battle of Red Cliff in China which he has suggested will be his equivalent of Akira Kurosawa’s Ran and his own personal legacy to the art of film.


References:

Filmography:
  • Paycheck (2003)
  • Hostage (2002) (Short)
  • Windtalkers (2002)
  • Blackjack (1998) (TV)
  • Face/Off (1997)
  • Once a Thief (1996) (TV)
  • Broken Arrow (1996)
  • Hard Target (1993)
  • Hardboiled (1992)
  • Once a Thief (1991)
  • Bullet in the Head (1990)
  • Tragic Heroes (1989)
  • The Killer (1989)
  • A Better Tomorrow II (1987)
  • A Better Tomorrow (1986)
  • Heroes Shed No Tears (1986)
  • Run Tiger Run (1985)
  • The Time You Need a Friend (1984)
  • Plain Jane to the Rescue (1982)
  • Laughing Times (1981)
  • To Hell with the Devil (1981)
  • From Riches to Rags (1980)
  • Follow the Star (1978)
  • Hello, Late Homecomers (1978)
  • Last Hurrah for Chivalry (1978)
  • Money Crazy (1977)
  • Hand of Death (1976)
  • Princess Chang Ping 1975)
  • The Dragon Tamers (1974)
  • The Young Dragons (1974)
  • Fist to Fist (1973)
  • Accidentally (1968)

Recommended Viewing:
  • Hostage (2002) (Short)
  • Windtalkers (2002)
  • Face/Off (1997)
  • Hardboiled (1992)
  • Once a Thief (1991)
  • Bullet in the Head (1990)
  • Tragic Heroes (1989)
  • The Killer (1989)
  • A Better Tomorrow II (1987)
  • A Better Tomorrow (1986)
  • Heroes Shed No Tears (1986)

Bibliography:

Dannen, F. (1997). Hong Kong Babylon. (1st Edition). Hyperion.

Logan, B. (1995). Hong Kong Action Cinema. (1st Edition). Titan Books.

Server, L. (1999). Asian Pop Cinema: Bombay to Tokyo. (1st Edition). Chronicle Books.

Yang, J. (2003). Once Upon A Time In China. (1st Edition). Atria Books.


Discography:

Ill Communication, The Beastie Boys, Capitol Records Inc, 1994. (Compact Disc, CDEST 2229)


Internet Reference:

“John Woo”, (2006, December), (imdb.com). Available: http:// www.imdb.com/name/nm0000247/ (Accessed: 2007, January 16)

“John Woo”, (2007, January 13), (wikipedia.com). Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Woo (Accessed: 2007, January 16)


Additional Reference:

Hardboiled, “Interview with John Woo (1999)”. Tartan Video, 2000. (Digital Versatile Disc, TVD 3301)

Friday, 17 May 2013

Icarus - Seeking Great Heights (the rise and fall of an independent film maker)

 Not everyone can become an overnight success, and some of those overnight successes burn to brightly too soon and as they reach a peak burn themselves out. a perfect example of this would have to be Troy Duffy. The Boondock Saints was, for all it's flaws, a great "independent film". I use Independent loosely as Harvey Weinstein had some involvement. The Boondock Saints was the recipient of a lot of online promotion before it's release and, to this day, a cult following.

 Granted there was a budget here and some very well-known stars and backing were involved, but Troy seeming read into his own hype and was the subject of the documentary, which is worth checking out and available on DVD, Overnight. Troy has since started to collect himself and try again. But the, not so great, sequel to his 1999 film only saw the light of day in 2009. These films watched in order: Boondock Saints, Overnight, Boondock Saints II, tell and trace a perfect story of failure.



Watching The Boondock Saints will fill you with a feeling of potential and possibility.







Overnight will see you watching the first film the next time around in a very different light.



Click to watch Trailer




 And finally The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day establishes a better budget however a 'play-it-safe' finished product with a sense of failed potential and an inability to recapture the feel of the original, it just didn't work.




 There are a few documentaries which also feature Troy plus online discussions on the rise and fall of Troy Duffy, and they are a perfect example of how not to behave should you have the opportunity to "make it" one day, if we are to believe the tainted light he is painted in, this is how not to act.

Sunday, 28 April 2013

Horror... It so is horrific!

 What defines horror? The dictionary describes the word horror thus:
1. Intense fear and loathing
2. Anything causing such a feeling
3. Strong aversion

  Being a child of the 80's I need to take my stance from that particular era of horror. The era which ignored Vampires, Werewolves, Zombies and Mummies and created new antagonists to cause feelings of fear and dread. In many ways horror of the 1980's set itself apart and in ignoring the boogie men of a silver screen age they created franchises which bordered on the ridiculous but created characters once seemingly synonymous with a movie going generation and resulting in much popcorn launching.
  Horror films of the 80's also went on the remove the antagonist and force the viewer to put themselves in the footsteps of the protagonist. But in turn create antagonists the viewing audience would come to love and root for, which flipped the paradigm more than the film makers and studio alike could have conceived.

 I lament the current horror films, and more so the Blair Witch approach which is now so freely adopted to poor effect. One day I'll write (Blog) something a little more substantial about this using the New Line Cinema tent pole (this one is easy, you shouldn't even need a link or to Google search!) as my villain of choice...