Powered By Blogger

Friday, 17 July 2015

Ant-Man (not quite a review)


  So on the 15th I went to an advanced screening of Ant-Man. My expectations were low, not because of the turmoil during production, but because the last few Marvel films have left me cold, unimpressed and unfulfilled. However Ant-Man is the first Marvel film I've enjoyed since the first Avengers film.

* NO SPOILERS AHEAD *


 Ant-Man starts a little weak with a flash back, and when I say weak it's because of some awful CGI (Just don't stare at Michael Douglas' face!), but as the film continues into Present Day it gathers into a more steady pace of character and arch development, and maguffin establishment. Paul Rudd was surprisingly convincing and didn't try to carry all of the humour in the film, in fact Michael Pena's character Luis provides most of the big laughs. The villain of the piece, Darren Cross, is played by Corey Stoll, who is thankfully sporting his natural baldness (That wig he has to wear in The Strain is TERRIBLE) and Evangeline Lilly (Hope van Dyne) and Michael Douglas (Hank Pym) round off the main cast. 
 The film is littered with Marvel universe in jokes, my favourite of which was when Scott Lang (Rudd) first dons the Ant-Man suit and gets sucked up by a Kirby vacuum cleaner.


  All in all, it's a great film and does well to not get mired in establishing future Marvel films, which has proven to be the ruin of EVERY Marvel sequel to date, and can be viewed as a standalone without having to watch Phase One and Two first.



 And being a Marvel film, the credits and post credits are littered with mouse watering (episodic) snippets, so remember to watch until the end of the credits.

Optimum viewing order:
Thor
Ant-Man

Upcoming:
Captain America: Civil War
Doctor Strange
Guardians of the Galaxy 2
(As yet untitled) Spider-Man (Reboot number 2)
Thor: Ragnarok
Avengers: Infinity Wars Part One
Black Panther
Captain Marvel
Avengers: Infinity War Part Two
Inhumans

Guilty Pleasures:
Howard the Duck
Blade
The Invincible Iron Man
Ultimate Avengers
Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes - Season One
Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes - Season Two

Wednesday, 15 July 2015

Vimeo Find of the Month - July (Please Open Documentary)


  I haven't done one of these in a while, as I've been rather busy working on projects, the website and the like, but it's time yet again for another... Vimeo Find of the Month!

View it here:

  This short documentary is actually about a movie cinema I spent many a Friday and Saturday night at in the late 80's and early 90's. On many occasion I was sadly the only person in the entire cinema.
  I was a bit of a loner around that time so I went to anything that was playing, no matter how bad! It was my way of supporting the owners at the time and a chance to get out of the house (before my rebellious latter teen years ensued).
  Some of the films I remember seeing there were Overboard, Housesitter, Wayne's World and Shadowlands.

Auckland's Crystal Palace
 I've always had a passion for the grandeur of classic cinema and theater design (many now of the past as more and more are demolished or left to age disgracefully), the mystique and majesty of the adornments were so intricate and engrossing you could stare in wonder for hours.... Then the lights went out and the movie began.

Auckland's St. James
Auckland's Civic
 If you can find it, Wayne Brittenden's now out of print The Celluloid Circus is a wonderful account of many of the now long gone cinemas and "picture houses".





Tuesday, 7 July 2015

Instamic on IndieGoGo


  So I've jumped on the bandwagon of another IndieGoGo funding venture. I saw the Instamic pop up quite a bit on my Facebook feed so I started watching it closely. It was an interesting idea and a great/cheaper/smaller/more versatile option for the Tascam or Zoom.


  Sadly I watched a little too long and missed the first wave of perks, so as soon as the second tier perks were up I funded.

 Pop over to the IndieGoGo Instamic page for MUCH more information

Some of the rather handsome specs & abundant information from the page:









Wednesday, 1 July 2015

Social Media - What should you be doing? (a disgruntled blocker)



  In an age of social media engagement it's very easy to hype yourself out of contention in vying for attention. What does this mean? Well with the heavier restrictions on engagement on Facebook (which are all aimed at profiting as they require monetary payment for your post to engage the public) it's harder and harder to reach the people who are interested.

  Just because you have X number of likes or followers, doesn't mean everybody is going to see your post/update, but this doesn't mean you have to re-post the same information repeatedly throughout the day, nor does it mean you have to constantly post.

  How do you convert posts and updates to views on Facebook? Well, to be honest I don't push either of my pages/groups but let me give you a rundown:











Page - Scapegoat Productions
Likes: 49
Last Post: 13 June 2015
People Reached: 21
Likes: 1
Comments: 0
Active promotion: 0
Availability: Open to All 











Group - Box Dog
Likes/Members: 80
Last Post: 29 June 2015
People Reached: 12
Likes: 5
Comments: 1
Active promotion: 0
Availability: Closed Group

Let's start with the page, the reached conversion rate is almost half and although there is a lack of interactivity, I have never actively promoted the page to gain more likes. People following that page are either past clients of friends of mine, if I want more coverage, I need to plead with those already subscribed to invite their friends which is paramount to panhandling and is probably going to drive people away. What I appear to be doing correctly however, is limiting the number of posts and updates which appears to convert to views. In fact until the demise of RSS Graffiti the majority of my posts on that group were RSS feeds from this blog. Constant engagement can be detrimental and result in your posts being blocked on timelines (the mentality is - I still want to follow the page, but I don't want the constant updates - I've even done this myself).

 Next, the group. Again this group is not regularly posted to, and although the last post was a poor conversion most previous posts reach a quarter or a third of the members, however I did falter on this one. I wasn't on the ball with the changes to notifications and probably should have promoted people to set the notifications to All Posts, the group doesn't spam, so it would have been a reasonable request but realistically it's a closed group and membership requests are filtered.


 What does this all mean??? Well people don't want to be bugged, the frequency of your posting will result in less people reached as more and more change the notification settings. You've probably done it to a friend, you feel guilty about potentially unfriending that person so instead you block their feed.

Reasons to block notifications:

1.      Constant updates
2.      Constant self-absorbed updates (individuals)
3.      Constant updates about negative things in your life (Individuals)
4.      Repeating updates
5.      Sharing Memes, pictures and videos (that don't relate to you, your company or your page/group) CONSTANTLY
6.      Regularly posting events or dates for events in another Country (if you have International followers)

 At least one of the above items would have caused you to block someone or something at least once.

 I work with bands every so often, whether it be for live videos or music videos and often they have no plan for social media, or they simply intend to post a link daily/hourly to something, whether it's a gig or a video or what have you. What I tell them, although specific to being a band, applies to everyone trying to self-promote.

How to post on social media:

1.      Resist the urge to post (Think - Is it post worthy?)
2.      Post once a week, twice a week very infrequently. You may have exciting things to share, but  
         share the relevant stuff - Gig this week (Get people through the door), video of your last show, 
         not so important (but if you have an event page on Facebook, put the video on THAT page!).
3.      Never upload your videos to Facebook, always upload them to You Tube or Vimeo and link to 
         them (this will give you better coverage and better analytics for views, from there you can find 
         out so much more about who you are actually reaching!)
4.      Keep it cheerful and keep it concise (say what you have to say in no more than 2 sentences,  
         leave out the bad news unless it's something catastrophic)
5.      Once your external link has created the preview, REMOVE the link! It looks messy! And yes 
         your information will still be posted provided the preview is still visible.
6.      If you are in a band or an employee of a company, get more views by sharing the post from the 
         band/company page. Individuals can share the latest update without making the source      
         page/group the bad guy (for over posting) - This too can generate additional members or likes 
         from those not already subscribed.

  Most of these solutions are pretty stupid proof, so it's more a matter of self-control or thinking strategically about your next comment or post. You might not always get the engagement you're looking for, but you will get the views, which means you are staying relevant in the eyes of subscribers. I know many many other people have posted similar articles or opinions on the mystical world of social media, but realistically, this is from the point of view of a regular blocker, I'm relaying the information that makes me either want to continue subscribing, block or unsubscribe, so it's all pretty obvious stuff really...

  Now, what if you don't already have social media covered and you're looking to start? Clearly the first place to start is with a presence on Facebook and if you're going to have video content, it would be wise to start a YouTube Channel or Vimeo Channel.

Do I want a group or a page on Facebook? 

Group:
  If you're looking for a fully interactive social media site, a group is a good place to start, this will allow members to discuss and or ask questions. You can assign administrators, but there is a further requirement for policing, especially since bots tend to randomly post every so often in open groups.
Page:
  If you're a band or a company not looking for full interactivity, a page is a better option. You only need people to like you and you're away, updates will be specifically about you or your "product", but you need people to amend that coveted Notification option! 

 In most cases, a page will suffice, if you're a film maker and looking to gain traction on an upcoming project, it might be worth trying a group to spark ideas and add to the creative process, but this is seldom done, you would be a pioneer!

 Lastly, don't spread yourself too thin, you don't need Tumblr, Blogger, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram etc.. Unless of course you have multiple people to look after these entities. You're not going to convert all your followers into across the board followers. They probably won't follow you on each social media platform, so start with the basics, Facebook and You Tube (again if you're going to have video), or Sound Cloud (that one should be obvious). The more platforms you're looking after, the more frequently you'll be burning time updating and interacting, and less time doing what you are meant to be doing (in said business or band). Just start a couple and go from there, you'll find Facebook may be all you require initially/eventually.


... Now, get NOT posting, and plan that next update carefully.

Wednesday, 20 May 2015

Pocket Cameras, Action Cameras, Smart Phones - The filming revolution is coming (it's already here!)


 I've been an advocate for pocket HD cameras for a while, ever since I got a Samsung U10. The U10 is probably the worst introduction to Pocket Cameras, as was the second one I got, a Kodak Zi10. BUT once I got my first Kodak Zx5, I was hooked, and impressed.

 Since those early days of trail and error by purchase, I have amassed an embarrassing number of smaller cameras. I currently have (with abridged Pros and Cons):

Samsung U10:
Pros:
Compact & surprisingly comfortable to hold

Cons:
Almost everything else (especially sound quality)


Kodak Zi10:
Pros:
External Mic input
Shoots wide when held upright = Comfortable single handed control
Tripod mountable

Cons:
TFT responsiveness is rubbish! You spend most of your time trying to get the options to respond.


Kodak Zi8:
Pros:
External Mic input
Tripod mountable

Cons:
Battery life when shooting 1080
Bulky/odd shape/size


2x Kodak Zx5:
Pros:
Waterproof to 3m
Tripod mountable

Cons:
Mic needs to dry out before next use (unless you cover the Mic and speak with a little Gaff)
Output format is compressed and m4v (not native for Final Cut Pro) so requires conversion for editing


Go Pro Hero (960):
Pros:
Compact
Heaps of accessories (including aftermarket) 

Cons:
No screen
Heavily dated
Not full HD
Awkward to hold so really needs to be mounted
Sound is terrible
Lens can't adapt and adjust quickly to changeable light conditions
Says supports 32gb SD, but often drops frames unless using a 16gb card


Go Pro Hero 2:
Pros:
Full HD 1080
Heaps of accessories (including aftermarket)

Cons:
No screen
Awkward to hold so really needs to be mounted
Sound is often terrible quality
Lens can't adapt and adjust quickly to changeable light conditions


Go Pro Hero 3+ Black:
Pros:
Wifi (including smart phone app operation)
More compact and a little less awkward to hold
Heaps of accessories (including aftermarket)
Replaceable battery
Wifi remote included

Cons:
Haven't used it enough yet (give it time)


4x SJ4000 (and Clones):
Pros:
Screen
Heaps of accessories (mostly aftermarket)
Replaceable battery
Good menu system for settings
Great adaptability to light changes

Cons:
Too many clones you often don't know whether Original, SJ, or Clone, or Clone of Clone (but most work fine, just no Firmware updates)
Battery is often ridiculously hard to get out if in a hurry (but I've potentially found a solution for this)


 So why am I dreading up all of this? Well just the other week Pixars John Lasseter said the likes of iPhones and GoPro's will change the face of filmmaking, and soon.

 Although, Chan-Wook Park filmed his short film Night Fishing on an iPhone 4 in 2011, it's obvious the revolution has long since started

Chan-Wook Park - Night Fishing

 Read the article on The Verge:

 We already know the filming revolution is here as more and more quality short films are produced using cheaper spectrum cameras and gear, but all this proves is that a good script, great actors and a little post magic in editing can make any footage appealing. John Lasseter has merely caught up and is now vindicating and advocating this movement towards what was once the lower end or taboo cameras. 
  Go Pro have their own channel dedicated to short films shot with their devices, and it's well worth wading through.

GoPro Short Film Channel


Links:
Kodak - Camera Comparison
Seemingly OLD buyers guide

Friday, 24 April 2015

Warm and Cool - A Week of Technique and Stylisation


    An often overlooked technique are the "warm" or "cool" looks. These techniques can be achieved using editing techniques and grading now, however they were once an in camera effect.

  Stylistically, these tones were/or have been achieved with film stock and lighting. The "Warm" look was achieved using daylight lighting with Tungsten film stock (think early Guy Ritchie films like Lock, Stock or Snatch). 

Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Trailer:

Snatch - Trailer:


  The "Cool" look was the reverse, using Tungsten lighting with Daylight film stock (think Brian Helgeland's Payback). 

Payback - Trailer:

  Granted the use of filters can and does go a long way to also achieve these looks, but for the ease of lay explanation, that is basically it.

For more in-depth information check this out:

Here's a video comparison:
                                                               - Pixels & Frequencies

  Meanwhile, over at Sploid, here is the original post, with the video from above:

Links:

Thursday, 23 April 2015

Editing... abridged - A Week of Technique and Stylisation


 And back over at No Film School this video was posted a few weeks back and is a quick explanation and look into the history of film editing by the guys at Film School'd.

Watch the video here:

The full article on No Film School:

  Although the above video is more dedicated to the art of perception, especially with the use of montage, there is some good information here. My main concern is the lack of clarity on continuity, which for me personally, can make or break a film. Bad continuity has the ability to remove the suspension of disbelief and completely lose the viewer interest in the process. 

Film Riot explain continuity here:

  My, personal, favourite film for excessive continuity errors has to be Jurassic Park and there is no end of videos pointing these errors out on You Tube, but here are a couple to help you better understand how a film, no matter how good you think, can be heavily marred by bad continuity.

Jurassic Park Mistakes Part One:

And for good measure, Part Two:

Links: